I came across an editorial in The New York Times written earlier this week entitled, The Secret Election. Ironically, the editorial had no named author which is mainly the idea of the entire piece, leaving me with no credibility to base the author off of. While the editorial had no author named, it was clear that the anonymous author strongly favored the passing of the Disclosure Act. The Disclosure Act, is an act being held up in the Senate right now by a strong Republican blockade. It would make anonymous campaign donors, who contribute millions of dollars for advertisements in support of a political party, attach their names to those donations. With this being said, the author is obviously voicing his frustrations and rallying fellow Democrats in favor of the act, while stating his case to Republican readers as well. The author is making an argument that these anonymous contributors are creating "secret elections," which are not good for Democracy, because the money being donated is usually going to one party. This creates a lopsided election in which the voters are seeing an overwhelming number of smear campaigns in favor of the Republican party. It is no secret that people such as Karl Rove are embracing this loophole in the law, even going as far as creating tax exempt organizations which help funnel the money funding these campaigns. With people hiding behind the first amendment, they are basically "buying" an election. This is the complete opposite idea of democracy, where the vote is in the hands of the people and not a few wealthy individuals. The author states at the end of his editorial, that it's crucial for this type of election to end and that it's necessary for the Disclosure Act to pass so that we can have fair elections from this point on.
I agree with this editorial and the argument that the author makes. If people were to see that a high percentage of the ads they were seeing on the television and in print were all funded by the same person, I think it would be less influential on them. I also believe that it's important for people to know the source of their information, especially when it comes down to an election where we are placing power into somebodies hands. An election is supposed to be a census of the people's honest ideas and beliefs, not ideas swayed by smear campaigns and bitter political rivalries.